Book Description
Expert authors provide an overview and introduction to the definitions and elements of the various crimes and defenses, integrating both the common law and Model Penal Code. Subjects covered include offenses against the person, habitation and occupancy, property, and other offenses. Reviews imputability, responsibility in general, limitations in criminal capacity, modifying circumstances, and special defenses.
Customer Reviews:
How To Read This Casebook.......2006-08-12
This is pretty much the standard case book for first year Criminal Law class.
But - this casebook is miles different from anything else you'll encounter in first year. And if you're lucky enough to use this book, those differences can make your study of Crimes a bit smoother.
What's the difference? The notes.
In my first year, I encountered casebooks with pages and pages of "notes" following the principle cases. Those notes asked questions, proposed hypos, and never gave answers. Sometimes, other cases were mentioned, but you'd have to look up those cases in order to get any answers.
Not so with Boyce's case book. Here, the principle case is not followed by "notes" in the traditional sense. No questions. No hypos. No vague references to other cases.
Instead, ten to fifteen rule-quotations from other cases follow the principle case.
Why does this matter? I'll tell you.
Read the "notes" first, before you read the principle case and definitely before you brief the case. You'll be absolutely stunned at how much easier it is to understand and brief the cases.
Once I caught on to this little trick, I cut my class prep time by about an hour a week. That gave me more time to study and take practice exams.
The result? An "A" on the final and in the course.
Law School Begins...........2005-10-07
This is your typical first year coursebook....mounds of reading. I think the best feature is the "notes" section after the case. This tests your knowledge of the issue and rule better than just reading.
Customer Reviews:
Casebook with excellent examples.......2004-01-07
I would have given this outstanding casebook five stars had the Table of Cases not contained so many page number errors. Nonetheless, this is otherwise a superbly organized and well-written casebook.
Each section contains an extensive series of detailed and probing hypotheticals that are unrivaled as a valuable student resource by any other casebook.
Book Description
Many scholars regard this as the definitive treatise on international criminal law. Written by 58 outstanding authorities from 19 countries, it covers the entire field, from the theory of what makes a crime "international" to the step-by-step conduct of an international prosecution. Its in-depth coverage includes: analysis of the doctrinal basis of international criminal law, the historical development of international criminal law and policy, detailed treatment of 16 crimes that have been given international jurisdiction, including torture, genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity, issues of immunity and jurisdiction, judicial assistance, recognition of foreign penal judgments, extradition and transfer of prisoners, taking evidence abroad, seizure of foreign assets, international criminal tribunals procedure, international criminal prosecutions in domestic courts. . .and a great deal more. Attention is paid throughout the presentation to the complex cultural and regional issues that often arise in this field of practice.
Book Description
This book is designed for use in a law school level course on Civil Procedure. It provides thorough coverage of pleading and procedure.
Customer Reviews:
Horrendous.......2005-12-04
We used this casebook for our criminal procedure adjucation course (bail to jail). The authors apparently hatched this cockamamie idea about writing a non-traditional criminal procedure casebook, and the result of their "efforts" is this 1500 page paperweight. The idea of the casebook was to not only include substantive constitutional criminal procedure law, but to incorporate cases about how the individual states deviate from the federal rules while weaving in policy aspects of the rules. The end product however was a frankenstein-ish collection of various rules and policy matters, with no real coherency or direction. The book was all over the place. In their efforts to create a non-traditional casebook, the authors have not succeeded on any front, whether it be policy or substantive law.
The problem is that unless students thoroughly understand the substantive law in an area, it is difficult to understand all the deviations and related policy matters. You can't do both at the same time because you will not learn either very well. There is a reason why criminal procedure adjudication has been taught in the "traditional" method for so many decades; it's EFFECTIVE. This book should just be taken off the market.
Book Description
The book examines the basis of discrimination against people with disabilities, including the history of such discrimination and a review of studies that explore why people engage in this sort of discrimination. It examines the federal laws that culminated in the passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The book describes the ADA's definition of disability, how it has been interpreted and studied, and then reviews the three major titles of the ADA, including a review of the remedies available for various ADA claims and the procedures required to pursue them.
Customer Reviews:
Good delivery time, condition as stated .......2007-01-11
Came in 2 days, good as described; very satisfied
Worst Textbook in Law School.......2006-12-27
I'm a 2L now, but I wanted to stop by and give my thoughts on this horrible book. There is entirely too much philosophy, as others have said. For the reviewer below, I don't want to offend you but most of us aren't in law school to spend long hours pondering over why we punish criminals. I just want to know the black letter law so that I can take an exam, score well, and hopefully get a decent job out of law school. This book is not helpful in any of the above.
I couldn't believe some of the stuff I read in this book. More often than not, I found myself asking what place any of this stuff had in a Criminal Law text. You'll see what I mean when you start reading. Much of Dressler's "teaching material" consists glorified fables and short stories which really have only a tangential relation to the subject matter. I especially enjoyed his excerpt from Willa Cather's "O Pioneers." I nearly dropped my book in amazment after coming across that one.
Useless waste of time, money, and effort.......2006-08-12
It is a shame that professors force their students to shell out big bucks to buy casebooks that don't help.
Even if you scored high on your LSAT and you have great reading comprehension, you will spend hours deciphering Dressler's philisophical babble. And when you finish your reading, you will realize that you retained little or nothing.
This is because Dressler does not clearly state the important concepts and conflicts of Criminal Law. He circumvents the important information that Criminal Law students need to know, and can only help to learn this information through inference. It's a glorified and expensive game of "hide the ball."
The overwhelming majority of students are confused by the book and the more successful students are those who avoid it entirely.
If you are forced to buy this book, I recommend reading only what is necessary to get by in class and learn Criminal Law through a hornbook, outline, or other method.
Do support Dressler's income by buying his supplements.......2006-05-02
Do yourself a favor...if you are assigned this textbook go ahead and buy the Black Letter Outline series by Dressler even if you don't use it until closer to finals. It gives you what you need to know and simplifies things so that you don't have to search round and round for it in the textbook. It's unfortunate Dressler feels the need to sell his supplements and as a result has to make his textbook so crappy. And yes, it really IS that bad.
Buy a companion guide!.......2006-01-13
The text is not a good tool for 1Ls to learn crim law by itself. Most of my classmates and I found the text to be poorly organized and written - especially for those just trying to grasp the intricacies of crim law. Probably a better book for studying statutory interpretation or philosophy of crim law. Prepare to become intimate with the MPC if you are assigned this text. I highly recomend a companion book for the text, one keyed to it such as Blackletter outline by Dressler or the Understanding Crim Law companion by Dressler. I used both and they saved me from utter confusion.
Average customer rating:
|
The Psychology And Law Of Criminal Justice Processes: Cases And Materials
Roger J. R. Levesque
Manufacturer: Nova Science Publishers
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Hardcover
 Courts
| Procedures & Litigation
| Law
| Subjects
| Books
General
| Criminal Law
| Law
| Subjects
| Books
Criminal Procedure
| Criminal Law
| Law
| Subjects
| Books
General
| Law
| Subjects
| Books
Jurisprudence
| Perspectives on Law
| Law
| Subjects
| Books
Criminology
| Crime & Criminals
| Nonfiction
| Subjects
| Books
Criminal Procedure
| Criminal Law
| Law
| Professional & Technical
| Subjects
| Books
All Titles
| Qualifying Textbooks - Fall 2007
| Stores
| Books
ASIN: 1594543127 |
Customer Reviews:
Great Criminal Law Casebook.......2004-10-08
If you could call a casebook awesome I would use those words here. This book is great for outlining and it leads you through Criminal Law step by step. You'll be amazed at your deep understanding of Criminal Law when you finish with this casebook.
Great fun for the law hobbyist.......2002-03-02
I bought this book on a whim. For a long time I had been interested in law and wanted to see what studying it was all about. I don't think I could have picked a better place to start. From the word go this book delivered interesting cases with in-depth analysis at the end of each one. The analysis was especially helpful in picking apart the important points of law that the case represented. Now when I watch Law and Order and The Practice, I can tell my girlfriend about what is going on (in the legal parts) and sound like a total know-it-all, which is totally awesome.
Good Casebook.......2001-08-25
It's a well written book for the first year, but it would not hurt if the schools used previous edition which can be available at mush cheaper price.
Great 1st year book!.......1999-12-15
OK, 1Ls of the world...this book is organized very well for outlining. The text covers all of the areas of criminal law, peppered with interesting cases drawn from around the country, and really does a good job of giving the reader a variety of perspectives on the contentious issues that comprise criminal law.
Concise.......1999-08-23
For first year law students it is a must. Reflection on this book even for the most seasoned attorney is recommended as well.
Amazon.com
Johannes Kepler's laws of planetary motion rank among science's biggest ideas. But did Kepler lie, steal, or even murder for the data he needed to complete his revolutionary calculations? Joshua and Anne-Lee Gilder make this bold claim in Heavenly Intrigue, the story of Kepler's troubled relationship with Tycho Brahe. The astronomers are shown as polar opposites--Kepler the anguished, poor misanthrope and Brahe the blustering young noble on intimate terms with King Frederick II. Since the authors tip their hand early in the book, it's easy to mistake the two men's lives as predestined, their sad fates written in the stars. Kepler, the suspect, is revealed to be consumed with a "constant boiling anger" and beset by illness and unhealed sores. When Kepler and Brahe meet, it is under a dark cloud of misunderstanding that foreshadows later conflicts. Each genius offends the other, publicly and privately: Brahe, holding the money and power, makes Kepler do tedious calculations rather than sponsoring original research, while Kepler demands patronage and lusts after valuable data. When the story is done, the narrative moves quickly to the 20th century. The apocryphal tale of Brahe's demise by burst bladder is systematically countered by researchers who find toxic levels of mercury in hairs from what is presumed to be Brahe's corpse. Did Kepler, who had means, motive, and opportunity, poison Brahe? Readers will either be convinced by the end of the prologue or have lingering doubts about the case's holes that even the authors' certainty can't patch. --Therese Littleton
Book Description
A real-life Amadeus: Set against the backdrop of the Counter-Reformation, this is the story of the stormy collaboration between two revolutionary astronomers, Tycho Brahe and Johannes Kepler. That collaboration would mark the dawn of modern science . . . and end in murder.
Johannes Kepler changed forever our understanding of the universe with his three laws of planetary motion. He demolished the ancient model of planets moving in circular orbits and laid the foundation for the universal law of gravitation, setting physics on the course of revelation it follows to this day. Kepler was one of the greatest astronomers of all time. Yet if it hadn't been for the now lesser-known Tycho Brahe, the man for whom Kepler apprenticed, Kepler would be a mere footnote in today's science books. Brahe was the Imperial Mathematician at the court of the Holy Roman Emperor in Prague and the most famous astronomer of his era. He was one of the first great systematic empirical scientists and one of the earliest founders of the modern scientific method. His forty years of planetary observations—an unparalleled treasure of empirical data—contained the key to Kepler's historic breakthrough. But those observations would become available to Kepler only after Brahe's death. This groundbreaking history portrays the turbulent collaboration between these two astronomers at the turn of the seventeenth century and their shattering discoveries that would mark the transition from medieval to modern science.
But that is only half the story. Based on recent forensic evidence (analyzed here for the first time) and original research into medieval and Renaissance alchemy—all buttressed by in-depth interviews with leading historians, scientists, and medical specialists—the authors have put together shocking and compelling evidence that Tycho Brahe did not die of natural causes, as has been believed for four hundred years. He was systematically poisoned—most likely by his assistant, Johannes Kepler.
An epic tale of murder and scientific discovery, Heavenly Intrigue reveals the dark side of one of history’s most brilliant minds and tells the story of court politics, personal intrigue, and superstition that surrounded the protean invention of two great astronomers and their quest to find truth and beauty in the heavens above.
Customer Reviews:
Scientist Assassins.......2006-04-05
Heavenly Intrigue, by Joshua and Anne-Lee Gilder, is a novel written with the assertion that scientist Johannes Kepler murdered scientist Tycho Brahe in the early seventeenth century. Before giving a myriad of forensic evidence to support this assertion, the authors offer a brief biography of each scientist that outlines both their personal and astronomical lives. Entwined in these facts are hints of Kepler's malevolent mental instability and his progressive hatred toward Brahe. Thus, the authors appear to have been motivated to write this novel as an attempt to reveal the true cause of Brahe's death and to label Kepler as not only a brilliant scientist, but a self-centered assassin. Aside from the darker, more hypothetical aspect of the novel, the authors describe each scientist's effect on posterity. Namely, Brahe instigated the methodology of science that develops theories after repeatedly gathering empirical data, while Kepler developed three planetary laws that redefined the structure of the solar system. Most importantly, both scientists opened avenues of ideas and questions that prompted Isaac Newton to discover the force of gravity. This novel is an ideal novel to read for a different perspective on two of history's most influential scientists. By intertwining their scientific achievements with historical background, it becomes easier to comprehend their lifestyles, motivations, and ambitions.
Intriguing scientific history.......2005-11-08
The Gilders have combined short biographies of both Brahe and Kepler to tell a story about early modern science, centered on their startling theory that Brahe was murdered by Kepler.
I haven't personally researched these individuals outside this book, so I don't feel fully qualified to comment on the rather sensational accusation which other reviewers here have dismissed so emphatically. But even from this one book, it's clear that Brahe, although a nobleman, didn't own land or substantial wealth which he could leave to his survivors. His income depended entirely on his professional skills and high reputation, which his children didn't share. So his death was an utter disaster for his family, rendering his wife an implausible suspect, notwithstanding the theories of some reviewers here. Kepler, who by winding up with control of Brahe's unique and immensely valuable body of astronomical observations was the greatest beneficiary of the scientist's death, is at least a plausible suspect.
Some writers have suggested that Brahe's death was an acidental overdose. (Alchemists of the period, and Brahe was one, did employ mercury in various elixirs.) But the Gilders' argument that Brahe owuldn't have accidentally administered the very large does of mercury that killed him I found quite persuasive.
It's unfortunate that the discussion of this book has centered so strongly on the controversy of whether Kepler was the killer, because there's a lot of other interesting material here, all of it skillfully told. The importance of Brahe's contribution to science, the remarkable ingenuity with which Brahe compiled observations actually more accurate than were possible with early telescopes, the analysis of why both Brahe and Kepler still took astrology quite seriously, and the remarkable methods which made it possible to demonstrate beyond serious dispute, 400 years after the fact, that Brahe died of mercury poisoning and not the traditionally supposed bladder or kidney failure, are all clearly described and make the book worth reading even if you can't accept the authors' murder theory.
Annoyingly Slanted. Not Science, But Speculation.......2005-06-18
When I borrowed a copy of this from the university library (thank God I didn't buy it), I was misled since it was the hardbound edition without the jacket, so all I saw was "Heavenly Intrigue." If I had seen the complete title, I wouldn't have bothered. The authors are truly of this generation, the CSI/forensic-wannabes (every cable channel has them now, very dismaying) who portray the facts from a mystery caper point of view, instead of looking at all the possible factors surrounding Brahe's death. Having read the other reviews, I find it just as compelling that it could have been Mrs. Brahe who had to euthanize him. And Brahe, although popular, had his own share of enemies, from religious extremists to possible other rivals. Maybe even kindergarten enemies, who knows? -- he did have a disfigured nose, a testament to his pugnacious nature. That should have been an obvious clue to the authors. As much as they try to give Kepler his due, they also paint him as a villain, on account of his mental troubles, his moods, etc. Well, I have news for the authors... most scientists have had their psychotic episodes: Newton suffered from depression (and by some accounts, a form of dementia) in his later years; Leibniz was worse off. Boltzmann wound up committing suicide. But the point of all this? Everyone, especially in those times, weren't quite right in the head. Hey, if you were living in war-ridden, plague-infested times, would you really be morally sound and civilized, the way we like to think of ourselves now?? I don't think so!!!!! And what is the whole point of this forensic crap?? Just to prove Brahe was murdered? To find a culprit, at any costs?? To make Kepler the Fall Guy??? The same has been said about some who have made important contributions in culture, science, and history, like Caravaggio or George Washington (both suspected and/or accused of murder in their lifetimes). The man lived miserably, and may not have been a saint. Despite Kepler's being obsessive a scientist (or philosopher, depending on your point of view) as he was... which scientist isn't?... he never quite expected to see the same kind of glory as Brahe did. Scientists then didn't enjoy the same prestige that we do now.
In closing, I will say that this book completely annoyed me, because it sought to reduce two of the most important scientific figures down to a scientific rivalry that went astray and resulted into yet another murder story. As storied and tumultuous their relationship was, there is no denying that both Brahe and Kepler's contributions helped usher in the modern era of science. Without them, Newton would not have had his Laws of Motion, Einstein would never have even thought of Relativity, and quantum mechanics may have never existed. Brahe and Kepler's story is so much more than that. Perhaps these so-called science writers (as well as those other investigative writers) should stop speculating -- like what the Da Vinci Code crowd likes to do -- and start thinking, really thinking about stuff that really matters, like the nature of everyday things and the universe. Life is not an endless cycle of Adam and Eve, and Cain and Abel but really a testament to the first seven days of Creation, and beyond, and how it works. And that is what scientists are primarily concerned about -- not about who's right or wrong. Ultimately, both Brahe and Kepler would have agreed as much.
Wrong Conclusion.......2005-05-20
I've researched this duo as well, extensively, from a scientific viewpoint, as one who works in a scientific field. The relationship between these two investigators is unique and well worth studying independently, away from the 'whodunnit' scenarios that this book creates.
The duo of Brahe/Kepler is an 'odd-couple'. For a few examples, of which there are countless dozens: Brahe was a showboat, he loved to party, cleanliness was his forte, kept up on his scientific discipline, whereas Kepler hated to bathe, seemed overly introverted, and was prone to reach out to spiritual/astrological notions about atronomical events.
The person most likely to kill Brahe was his devoted wife, whom he virtually ignored. She was the one who administered his medicine on his deathbed. Tycho suffered for days, the pain never went away. And so it was his wife who euthanised him. The author Joshua Gilder ignored the family's role in Tycho's death, as Tycho ignored his family during his life. With many children, all to maintain the observatory, we hear of not one child who was interested in the data he collected, or even suspicious of malfeasance. It's too bad, because in ignoring the role of Tycho Brahe's family, Gilder poorly scandalised a great scientific contributor, Johannes Kepler.
If you are interested in this topic, please conduct your own research, it will be worth it. Because the book is awful.
The condemnation of an Innocent Man - its a shame.......2005-04-11
The Gilder's make a very interesting accusation in their novel (read: novel, fiction). Sadly, this accusation is backed up by half-proofs and misrepresentations.
Kepler's words, which have been so methodically groomed throughout this novel, condemn him to no end. He wrote about childhood trauma (giving him an unstable mind... one that could commit murder), He wrote about his incessent anger (giving him the ability to lash out and hurt someone), and he wrote about his obsession with obtaining Brahe's data (a motive for murder). Sadly, however, all of Kepler's words, though they are true, only tell half the story of the man's life. Self Analysis, which the Gilder's obtained most of their 'evidence', was written as an exercise for Kepler, and much of what he said was overly harsh onto himself, and he likely didn't belive much of what he said about himself. As for his letters, much of the same can be said for them. They included letters that looked badly on him, but failed to include those which would give him a softer edge.
I'm sad that this might be the only book on Kepler and Brahe people will read, if they read others, a different picture of the two can be painted. Though, because of the current CSI craze, many people, including fellow reviewers, seem to be taking this as the word of god and saying that these forenzics don't lie. Maybe not, but Kepler isn't the guy they're looking for, he's just an exciting, interesting scapegoat.
The book was written in an accessable format, and if one can keep an objective mind and realize that the Gilder's are spitting a lot of bullsh*t, one can learn a fair deal about Astronomy and Alchemy. It's a shame that that won't be all.
I only hope that the scientific world comes out swinging on this one and puts an end to the Gilder's unfounded condemnation of Johannes Kepler
Book Description
Heavenly Intrigue is the fascinating, true account of the seventeenth-century collaboration between Johannes Kepler and Tycho Brahe that revolutionized our understanding of the universe–and ended in murder.
One of history’s greatest geniuses, Kepler laid the foundations of modern physics with his revolutionary laws of planetary motion. But his beautiful mind was beset by demons. Born into poverty and abuse, half-blinded by smallpox, he festered with rage, resentment, and a longing for worldly fame. Brahe, his mentor, was a flamboyant aristocrat who had spent forty years mapping the heavens with unprecedented accuracy–but he refused to share his data with Kepler. With Brahe’s untimely death in Prague in 1601, rumors flew across Europe that he had been murdered. But it took twentieth-century forensics to uncover the poison in his remains, and the detective work of Joshua and Anne-Lee Gilder to identify the prime suspect–the ambitious, envy-ridden Kepler himself. A fast-paced, true-life account that reads like a thriller,
Heavenly Intrigue is a remarkable feat of historical re-creation.
Customer Reviews:
Not buying the whole tale..........2006-09-06
This book discusses the lives and relationship between two key figures in astronomy, Tycho Brahe and Johannes Kepler. Brahe was a nobelman who shrugged off political life to pursue his love of science and the stars. Kepler was a commoner who also studied the heavens and developed the laws of planetary motion. Kepler is portrayed as an insecure man looking for acceptance. The book also gives me the impression that Kepler did not like Brahe, while Brahe seems to be constantly helping Kepler and his family. Kepler is given a job by Brahe and Brahe also pays Kepler out of his own pocket, while his financial situation is being resolved. However, Kepler seems to go out of his way to fight with Brahe and look for a way to get out from under Brahe's control. Regardless of the help being given by Brahe.
The main point of the book is to lay the foundation and grounds for why someone would want to murder Brahe. Namely Kepler. I am not an expert in either astronomers' life, but I find the book too one sided. I would have to do more research to come to a conclusion, but for now my verdict is out. I have read a little that brings into question some of the findings from the tests performed on Brahe's hair.
I do not think the issue is as clear cut as the book tends to conclude. The book also doesn't clearly discuss the questions with the test results. The book was still enjoyable to read, but I believe more research is required to come to any conclusions.
A Fraud.......2006-08-05
I'd have some respect for this book if it were marketed at a work of fiction because that's what it is. The authors have little familiarity with any aspect of their subject. It's particularly unlikely that Tycho would have spent the last day of his life tying up loose ends, such as taking care that his common law wife and children would be his heirs, if his death were unexpected. And no one who has studied Kepler closely and honestly could imagine him capable of murder.
A historical re-creation of the seventeenth-century collaboration between geniuses Johannes Kepler and Tycho Brahe.......2006-01-05
Heavenly Intrigue: Johannes Kepler, Tycho Brahe, And The Murder Behind One Of History's Greatest Scientific Discoveries is a historical re-creation of the seventeenth-century collaboration between geniuses Johannes Kepler and Tycho Brahe. Kepler's scientific brilliance laid the foundation for modern physics, and his mentor Brahe spent forty years mapping the heavens with more accuracy than any before him; yet Brahe refused to share his maps with Kepler. When Brahe died far too young in 1601, rumors circulated that he had been murdered, yet it took twentieth- century forensics to reveal the proof - poison in Brahe's remains. Authors Joshua Gilder and Anne-Lee Gilder apply detective work to point a reasoned accusation against the ambitious Kepler. Heavenly Intrigue is a simply stunning, thoroughly researched work that dares to question the personal character of great thinkers.
Book Description
This digital document is an article from Queen's Quarterly, published by Thomson Gale on September 22, 2005. The length of the article is 3761 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
Citation Details
Title: Witchcraft, suspicious death, and planetary orbits.(Heavenly Intrigue: Johannes Kepler, Tycho Brahe, and the Murder behind One of History's Greatest Scientific Discoveries)(Kepler's Witch: An Astronomer's Discovery of Cosmic Order amid Religious War, Political Intrigue, and the Heresy Trial of his Mother)(Tycho and Kepler: The Unlikely Partnership that Forever Changed Our Understanding of the Heavens)(Book Review)
Author: Stan Corbett
Publication:
Queen's Quarterly (Magazine/Journal)
Date: September 22, 2005
Publisher: Thomson Gale
Volume: 112
Issue: 3
Page: 416(13)
Article Type: Book Review
Distributed by Thomson Gale
Books:
- Criminal Procedure, Keyed to Weaver (Casenote Legal Briefs)
- Critique and Radical Discourses on Crime (Advances in Criminology)
- Defamation Via Satellite a European Perspective
- Der verdrängte Finanznotstand: Zur finanzpolitischen Verantwortlichkeit von Parlament und Regierung sowie zur Rolle des Bundes als Hüter der finanzwirtschaftlichen Souveränität
- Diccionario de Terminos de Marketing, Publicidad y Medios de Comunicacion / Dictionary of Marketing, Publicity, and Media Terms (Ariel Referencia)
- Disclosing tilt: Law, belief, and criticism
- Discoveries: Gaudi: Visionary Architect (Discoveries (Abrams))
- Employment Law in Europe: A Country by Country Guide for Employers
- Essential Godzilla (Marvel Essentials)
- Evidence: Problems, Cases And Materials (Carolina Academic Press Law Casebook)
Books Index
Books Home
Recommended Books
- The Oregon Trail
- Night Embrace
- Games of Life: Explorations in Ecology, Evolution and Behaviour
- Guide to the Birds of Alaska
- Interior Design Portable Handbook : First-Step Rules of Thumb for Interior Architecutre
- Telling Ain't Training
- Parthian Shot: A Marcus Corvinus Roman Mystery
- The American Porch: An Informal History of an Informal Place
- Landscape Narratives: Design Practices for Telling Stories
- I Found a Baby Rabbit, What Do I Do
Cases and Materials on Torts (University Casebook Series) (University Casebook Series)
Contracts: Cases and Materials (University Casebook Series)
Gilbert Law Summaries : Criminal Law
Casenote Legal Briefs: Criminal Law - Keyed to Dressler
Selections For Contracts, 2003 (University Casebook)
